I use a brilliant essay from 1938 entitled 'The Revolution Was', written by journalist Garet Garrett to demonstrate how our government was already subjected to a 'revolution' by FDR.
I have multiple examples of the Roosevelt's being bad for America. They are actually way up the list. I won't be as sensational as to call them traitors. But that would almost be the word. Would you be interested in discussing it?
I agree with everything you said. But I have a problem with the essay itself.
“There was here no choice of means. The use of force was not to be considered. therefore, it had to be done by ballot… Few of the great majority that voted in November, 1932 for less Federal government and fewer Federal functions could have imagined that by the middle of the next year the extensions of government and the multiplication of its functions would have been such as to create serious administrative confusion in Washington…”
“...it had to be done by ballot...”?
That seems to be a contradiction. The American people never did and never would vote for Marxism/socialism. In fact, as the essay says, they voted for people who promised “less Federal government and fewer Federal functions”. If the revolution could have been won by the ballot, then the Communists and Workers Parties of the early 1900s would have won elections. But they didn't win anything. Americans voted against those ideas every time.
Nor did the left win by “propaganda”. Again, if Marxist/leftist propaganda could win in America, then the Communists and Workers Parties would have won.
The Revolution was not voted in at the ballot. And if it was not installed by force, then how exactly was it installed? What means did the left use to complete their Revolution, and take control of the government of the United States. It's a question that many people will give off-the-cuff answers to. But they are always wrong. The truth is, no one understands what means the left really used to win the revolution. If we did understand it, we could use that means to dismantle the leftist regime that now rules America.
I have multiple examples of the Roosevelt's being bad for America. They are actually way up the list. I won't be as sensational as to call them traitors. But that would almost be the word. Would you be interested in discussing it?
I have multiple examples from 1824 to 2001 to 2024 and from 1935 to 1999 to 2023
I agree with everything you said. But I have a problem with the essay itself.
“There was here no choice of means. The use of force was not to be considered. therefore, it had to be done by ballot… Few of the great majority that voted in November, 1932 for less Federal government and fewer Federal functions could have imagined that by the middle of the next year the extensions of government and the multiplication of its functions would have been such as to create serious administrative confusion in Washington…”
“...it had to be done by ballot...”?
That seems to be a contradiction. The American people never did and never would vote for Marxism/socialism. In fact, as the essay says, they voted for people who promised “less Federal government and fewer Federal functions”. If the revolution could have been won by the ballot, then the Communists and Workers Parties of the early 1900s would have won elections. But they didn't win anything. Americans voted against those ideas every time.
Nor did the left win by “propaganda”. Again, if Marxist/leftist propaganda could win in America, then the Communists and Workers Parties would have won.
The Revolution was not voted in at the ballot. And if it was not installed by force, then how exactly was it installed? What means did the left use to complete their Revolution, and take control of the government of the United States. It's a question that many people will give off-the-cuff answers to. But they are always wrong. The truth is, no one understands what means the left really used to win the revolution. If we did understand it, we could use that means to dismantle the leftist regime that now rules America.